Legal Opinion

Malumphy v. MacDougall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1980No. M-192-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a prisoner at the state prison, sought relief by special action to require the Director of the Department of Corrections to comply with the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, A.R.S. § 41-1001 et seq., by filing with the Secretary of State certain rules and regulations governing inmate custody criteria.

The Director of Corrections states in his response that the regulations in question have not been filed with the Secretary of State because the regulations are merely statements "concerning only the internal management of the agency and exempt from the requirement for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Wilkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. David Fierro v. Ellis C. MacDougalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Thomas v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API