David Fierro v. Ellis C. MacDougal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentBoochever, Circuit Judge
Fierro challenged on due process grounds his transfer from the general population of the state prison to “administrative segregation” where he would not receive “good time” credit. I agree with the majority, that the district court properly dismissed Fierro’s petition for mandamus because he seeks to have us compel action by a state official. 28 U.S.C. § 1361.
I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s conclusion that Fierro could not have amended his complaint to state a viable claim under § 1983. Courts should construe pleadings filed by pro se litigants like Fierro liberally,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fierro v. MacDougalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982