Legal Opinion

Hale v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1972No. 27034PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

1. Under the testimony adduced upon the trial, the value of a "milk base” to a dairyman is that it determines the amount of milk which is salable at Class I prices, while any amount in excess of such "milk base” produced by such dairyman must be sold at a lesser price. There was evidence adduced which would have authorized the jury to determine that the price agreed upon by the parties was not inadequate so as to authorize the refusal of a specific performance decree upon such ground.

Nor is the contention of the seller meritorious that, since the quantity was unknown at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Council v. TealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Granger v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Giant Peanut Co. v. Carolina Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Bob Maddox Dodge, Inc. v. McKieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Kohlmeyer & Co. v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API