Council v. Teal
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Crisp. City court of Americus. January 16, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
On August 30, 1900, H. E. Teal and M. B. Council entered into a written contract under the terms of which the former was to drill an artesian well on the farm of the latter, commencing with casing four and one half inches in diameter and finishing with casing as large as practicable, the work to be commenced as near the first of October as practicable and to be pushed to completion as fast as practicable. It was stipulated in this contract that Teal did not guarantee the well “to flow above the surface,” but was to be paid “one dollar per foot for the depth of well drilled,” and that Council…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roberts v. KeelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Allen v. KesslerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. Bedgood & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Turner v. Alexander & AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eiberger v. Martel Electronic Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Harrell v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Hale v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Borders v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.