Legal Opinion

Hill v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 11, 2007No. AC 27485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The petitioner, Joseph Hill, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that he was denied (1) due process of law because the trial court improperly instructed the jury on a crime with which he had not been charged 1 and (2) the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel failed (a) to ensure that the jury did not see the petitioner in prison garb and shackles and (b) to object to the court’s instruction as to accessorial liability. 2 We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Jenkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Kelley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Brooks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Stevens v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Hill v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API