Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 1, 2008No. AC 27944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The respondent, the commissioner of correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting relief to the petitioner, Corey Brooks, on count two of his habeas petition and ordering the petitioner resentenced to a lesser term of years on his violation of probation and other charges. The respondent claims that (1) the court’s finding that the state violated its plea agreement with the petitioner is not supported by the evidence, (2) the court acted improperly when it ordered specific performance of the original plea agreement and (3) the court lacked jurisdiction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. United States v. KummerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. RiversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. H. P. T. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Godfrey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Brooks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Brooks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API