Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Sturm

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 1, 1973No. 72-139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dixon

A complaint was filed by the plaintiffs, Paul Mercer and Joyce Mercer, for an order enjoining the defendant, Wallace F. Sturm, from interfering with their construction, maintenance, and use of a driveway along the boundary between their property and his but lying on his land. A temporary injunction was issued by the Circuit Court of Peoria County, Illinois; a motion for summary judgment was filed by the defendant and denied; a hearing on the merits took place before the Court without a jury; an injunction was granted which prohibited the defendant from interfering with the plaintiffs’ use of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Petersen v. CorrubiaIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Anastaplo v. RadfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mueller v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Girard v. Lehigh Stone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Boland v. WaltersIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Pleasure Driveway & Park District v. KurekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Keck v. ScharfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Department of Transportation v. CavagnaroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Tatum v. DanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API