Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Dance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 1992No. 91-1098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

605 So.2d 110 (1992)

Ray TATUM, Appellant,

v.

Robert M. DANCE, Appellee.

No. 91-1098.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 14, 1992.

Rehearing Denied October 1, 1992.

John V. Baum of Panico & Baum, Maitland, for appellant.

John F. Bennett of Fishback, Dominick, Bennett, Stepter & Ardaman, Orlando, for appellee.

GRIFFIN, Judge.

In this foreclosure action, the mortgagee, Ray Tatum, has appealed the order of the lower court holding that Robert Dance, the mortgagor, is entitled to an irrevocable license for drainage onto the mortgaged property. We affirm.

In 1975, the southern portion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burdine v. SewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Eppling v. SeuntjensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Haines v. Minnock Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. DorseySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Jenkins v. LykesSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dance v. TatumSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Tarin's, Inc. v. TinleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Brevard County v. BlaskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Blackburn v. LefebvreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. MH New Investments, LLC v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API