Legal Opinion

Martin v. See

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 1992No. 4-91-0731PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Plaintiffs were granted implied easements by way of necessity over defendant’s land for farming purposes only. Defendant appeals, contending the trial court’s decision was against the manifest weight of the evidence. We affirm.

The basis of this lawsuit involves the use of a private road which adjoins three tracts of land located in Anderson Township, Clark County. A map depicting the land involved is attached to and made a part of this opinion. The road in question runs north to south for approximately one-quarter of a mile from a public road which generally runs east to west. The road in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Petersen v. CorrubiaIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mueller v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Granite Properties Ltd. Partnership v. MannsIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Rexroat v. ThorellIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gerald Dix v. Edelman Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Wilder v. FinneganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Estate of Welliver v. AlbertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Smith v. HeissingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Gacki v. BartelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API