Legal Opinion

United States v. Witherspoon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1954No. 11880PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, circuit judge.

The government brought suit against appellee under the provisions of the Surplus Property Act 1 to recover damages for the fraudulent conduct of appellee in procuring surplus property from the War Assets Administration by the use of “Certificates of Veteran’s Preference” unlawfully acquired from war veterans who were entitled to such certificates. Appellee moved to dismiss the government’s complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The District Court sustained appellee’s motion to dismiss on this ground, and, on appeal, the sole…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Bridges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. G. A. Nichols Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. United States v. GraingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. Robert E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Core Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. DomanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API