Legal Opinion
United States v. Klinger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 3, 1952No. 23, Docket 22387PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L HAND, Circuit Judge.
The only point, which we find it necessary to decide upon these appeals is whether the prosecution was barred by the Stat-ute of Limitation. The convictions were imder an indictment found on March 31, 1950 which cha d the defendants with . ... . , . TT . , „ „ , conspiracy to defraud the United States; 1 P that is, by impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of any department of Government”, 2 in this instance the rationing of sugar through the Office of Price Administration. It is not necessary to set out the evidence beyond saying- that the prosecution…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. ShowalterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
3Cited by43 opinions
- Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Textile Workers Union v. American Thread Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- City of Chicago v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- United States v. GraingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Cornelius v. Benevolent Protective Order of ElksDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.