Legal Opinion

Pacific Indem. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. 32047PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

Which of two insurers should stand the loss attributable to the operation of an automobile leased out for a two-year period, the insurer of the lessee-operator or the insurer of the lessor-owner ? Brown-Massie & Associates, the lessee-operator of the leased automobile (car No. 901), was insured under a comprehensive liability policy issued by Pacific Indemnity Company. California Rent Car, the lessor-owner of the automobile, was insured under a comprehensive liability policy issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Car No. 901, while being driven by an employee of BrownMassie, became…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Argonaut Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Metz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hellman v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API