Burt v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
In the court below the defendant, Rube Burt, was convicted of the offense of possessing whiskey in a dry county. The cause was tried by the court without a jury.
The only question of prime concern is a review of the action of the trial judge in denying the appellant’s motion to exclude the evidence. Robinson v. State, 222 Ala. 541, 133 So. 578.
Armed with a search warrant the officers went to the home of the defendant and “found in his kitchen a drinking glass of whiskey and in one of the bed rooms a pint in a coat pocket and in another bed room under the bed a pint, under…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ammons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Emerson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Huckabaa v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Talbot v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Hubbert v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961