Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Plant

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

Defendants present the case herein on the principle that they were entitled to have their theory of the case presented to the jury, which they claim was not done. The requested instruction does not correctly state the law applicable either to the pleadings or the testimony of the defendants. Defendants pleaded contributory negligence. First:

“In that the automobile of which plaintiff was an occupant was being operated at the time complained of at a high and dangerous rate of speed, to wit: in excess of 15 miles per hour.”

Second:

“That the plaintiff herein and operator of said car failed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manary v. RunyonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hawkins v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Estate of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lewis v. Continental Causalty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wesley v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Erb v. ShopeOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Broyles v. Estate of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API