Legal Opinion · Dissent

Broyles v. Estate of Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1983No. TC A8103-01329, CA A25385, SC 29607Published

1DissentCampbell, J.

I dissent. The majority has adopted a new rule interpreting ORS 19.160 and affirms the Court of Appeals. I disagree with the new rule and continue to favor the old rule. For those reasons I would reverse the Court of Appeals. An assessment of 10 percent of the damages should not be imposed against the defendant in this case.

ORS 19.160 in almost the same identical form has been a part of our laws since the Deady Code.1 During that *805period of time, this court through its case law developed the following test for the assessment of a penalty under the statute: A party who desired an appellate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Shaw v. Pacific Supply CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API