Legal Opinion

Harned v. E-Z Finance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1953No. A-3712PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewster

This cause is here on a question certified by the Court of Civil Appeals at El Paso, pending its disposition of a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, W. R Harned. On original consideration it affirmed the judgment of the County Court at Law of Dallas County dismissing the case for want of jurisdiction.

Harned sued four loan companies and one insurance company, appellees, for statutory penalties of $137.50 as usurious interest, which he alleged appellees conspired to charge and collect from him. He sought recovery of an additional sum of $150 on these allegations:

“In separate and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ex Parte Emory H. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Barnett v. Collection Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. So Relle v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Billings v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Moore v. LilleboTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API