Ferry v. O'Brien
California Court of Appeal
'APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting motions to strike out cost hill and to file new one, to vacate judgment entered upon first bill, and also from an order refusing to vacate the order granting said motions. Charles S. Grail, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Upon a former appeal of this action the judgment was affirmed and respondent was awarded his costs. The remittitur was filed with the clerk of the trial court May 17, 1922. On May 19th respondent filed with the clerk of said court his memorandum, of costs and disbursements, amounting to $29.50. On May 26, 1922, respondent gave notice that he would, on June 2, 1922, move the court for leave to file a new and further memorandum of costs and disbursements, on the ground that the former one served and filed by him was, by reason of inadvertence and mistake on the part of respondent, incorrectly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Vinson v. Los Angeles Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Moulin Electric Corp. v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.