Legal Opinion
Moulin Electric Corp. v. Roach
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1981No. Civ. 60341PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, J.
Defendants, Noyes H. Roach and Noyes Roach Company, appeal from a minute order denying them their postjudgment attorney’s fees. The appeal lies (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (b)) but is without merit for the reasons that follow.
On February 6, 1980, defendants filed a notice of motion for post-judgment attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,403 for professional services rendered to them from March 25, 1978, the approximate date of a prior award of such fees in the amount of $11,364.50. The trial court denied this motion, when subsequently made, as untimely.
The denied fees were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Beneficial Standard Properties, Inc. v. ScharpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Care Construction, Inc. v. Century Convalescent Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leitman v. BooneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Diamond v. John Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sparkman v. SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Merced Production Credit Ass'n v. SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Eldorado Bank v. LytleAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.