McKnight v. School District of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted.
1. FACTS.
Because the facts of this case have been set forth at length in a prior Memorandum Opinion, a brief factual recitation follows. See McKnight v. Sch. Dist. of Phila., 105 F.Supp.2d 438 (E.D.Pa.2000). The Plaintiff, Michael A. McKnight (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. McKnight”), was employed as a teacher by the Defendant School District of Philadelphia (“School’ District”) from September, 1976 through December 17, 1997, when he was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Kern v. DAS Companies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Seyoum v. HM Health Solutions Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020