Legal Opinion

McKnight v. School District of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 2001No. CIV.A. 00-573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

Before this Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is granted.

1. FACTS.

Because the facts of this case have been set forth at length in a prior Memorandum Opinion, a brief factual recitation follows. See McKnight v. Sch. Dist. of Phila., 105 F.Supp.2d 438 (E.D.Pa.2000). The Plaintiff, Michael A. McKnight (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. McKnight”), was employed as a teacher by the Defendant School District of Philadelphia (“School’ District”) from September, 1976 through December 17, 1997, when he was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Kern v. DAS Companies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Seyoum v. HM Health Solutions Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API