Legal Opinion
Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 1, 1993No. 1429, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLOOM, Judge.
The dispute that resulted in this appeal, after seven years of spirited litigation, began with an announcement by appellee Fairchild Industries, Inc. (Fairchild), in August 1983, that it intended to close its main plant in Hagerstown, Maryland, thereby putting about 2,800 employees out of work. Three of those employees began the litigation by filing in the Circuit Court for Washington County a complaint against Fairchild and its chief executive officer, appellee Edward G. Uhl, asserting claims for fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Crosten v. KamaufDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Edell & Associates, P.C. v. Law Offices of Peter G. AngelosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Sass v. AndrewCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.