Legal Opinion

Pieh v. Flitton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,672PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This action was brought on two promissory notes executed by the defendants.

As one of their defenses, defendants pleaded that plaintiff had a homestead claim near Wolf Point, Montana, which he offered to sell and relinquish to them; that he falsely and fraudulently represented that defendants could obtain a patent to the land free from reservations of minerals; and that in reliance upon these representations the defendants gave the notes in question and made a homestead entry of the land. It was alleged that such a patent could not be obtained and that the land was subject to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Perkins v. TrinkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Barber v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Colby v. Life Indemnity & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Valley v. Crookston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Wood Bros. Thresher v. EicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Lyon Financial Services, Incor v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Parkside Mobile Estates v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API