Legal Opinion
Regal v. Riegel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1969No. 42002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This action originated in the district court as an action to establish and enforce a constructive trust in real property and for an accounting. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of defendants and against the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled and the plaintiff has appealed.
The appeal concerns primarily that part of the judgment in favor of the principal defendant in the trial court, H. E. Riegel. The plaintiff in error, H. A. Regal, who was the plaintiff in the trial court, is the son of the defendant in error, but in 1936 had changed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Barry v. FrizzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Nisbet v. Midwest Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Goodwin v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Easterling v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Matter of Estate of IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Merrill v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.