Legal Opinion

John Doe A. v. Diocese of Dallas

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. 106546PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, and Garman concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Burke took no part in the decision.

OPINION

The issue in this case is whether section 13 — 202.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Public Act 93 — 356 (735 ILCS 5/13 — 202.2 (West 2006)), may be applied to permit an action for personal injury based on childhood sexual abuse to proceed where that action would otherwise have been time-barred under the law as it existed when the amendment took effect. The circuit court of St. Clair County held that the amendment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County CollectorIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Clay v. KuhlIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Charles Anderson v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. v. IEC (Montgomery), LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards v. BosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API