Garrett v. Southern Railway Company
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case was employed as a wheel moulder by Lenoir Car Works, a Tennessee corporation. He claims injuries from silicosis contracted from silica dust permeating the foundry. But the questions whether he had silicosis, and the amount of injury, are not reached in this phase of the case.
The sole question here is whether defendant, Southern Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as Southern), which acquired the entire capital stock of Lenoir Car Works (referred to hereinafter as Lenoir) in 1904, the year of the latter’s organization, so…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Glanzer v. St. Joseph Indian SchoolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Duff v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Adams v. Republic Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Bank of America Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.