Boston v. N.C. Private Protective Services Board
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
When reviewing a final administrative decision, the trial judge’s conclusion must “rest on whether there was substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted.” Lackey v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 306 N.C. 231, 237-8, 293 S.E.2d 171, 176 (1982). We note parenthetically that Lackey interpreted G.S. 150A-5K5) which has been recodified intact as G.S. 150B-51(5). This standard of judicial review is known as the “whole record” test. Id. at 238, 293 S.E.2d at 176, citing Thompson v. Wake Cty. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977).
“Substantial evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re the Appeal From the Denial of the Application to DredgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State Highway Commission v. Greensboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Mooresville Hospital Management Associates, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Beason v. North Carolina Department of the Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Cowan v. N.C. Private Protective Services BoardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Beason v. North Carolina Department of the Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.