Legal Opinion

Travers v. Louden

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1967No. Civ. 29809PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J. *

This action was brought by Tad Travers against Arthur J. Louden and wife and Robert E. Highman seeking declaratory relief. The Loudens made a motion for summary judgment, the motion was granted and the action was dismissed as to all defendants. Plaintiff appeals. The respondents have not filed a brief.

The amended complaint alleged that on August 12, 1963, Louden agreed to sell and Travers agreed to buy Lot 37, Tract 530, situated in Torrance, California for $35,000; Travers paid $100 of the purchase price; the agreement provided “If for any reason, undersigned, as seller, is unable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Strutt v. Ontario Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Roberts v. Los Angeles County Bar Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Environmental Defense Project v. County of SierraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API