Legal Opinion

Craig Coal Mining Co. v. Romani

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1986No. 00089PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This appeal lies from an Order granting summary judgment.

Appellant, Craig Coal Mining Company, through its president, Robert Woods, contracted with appellee, Frank Roma-ni, for the sale of a “4500 Manitowac Dragline”, a piece of machinery used in strip mining. The agreement was based on a mailgram offer of sale to appellee wherein time was made of the essence in performance of both buyer’s and seller’s obligations. The acceptance contained a date certain for the closing, at which appellant was to transfer clear title to the machine. This required delivery of a release of lien…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicarella v. PassantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Hetkowski v. Dickson City Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. The B's Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. B. P. Barber & Associates, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. Pittsburgh Die Sinkers Lodge No. 50 v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Party City Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Liddle v. ScholzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Bradford Dyeing Assoc. v. J. Stog Tech GmbHSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API