Craig Coal Mining Co. v. Romani
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
This appeal lies from an Order granting summary judgment.
Appellant, Craig Coal Mining Company, through its president, Robert Woods, contracted with appellee, Frank Roma-ni, for the sale of a “4500 Manitowac Dragline”, a piece of machinery used in strip mining. The agreement was based on a mailgram offer of sale to appellee wherein time was made of the essence in performance of both buyer’s and seller’s obligations. The acceptance contained a date certain for the closing, at which appellant was to transfer clear title to the machine. This required delivery of a release of lien…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicarella v. PassantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hetkowski v. Dickson City Borough School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- The B's Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. B. P. Barber & Associates, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Pittsburgh Die Sinkers Lodge No. 50 v. Pittsburgh Forgings Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by15 opinions
- McDermott v. Party City Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Liddle v. ScholzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Bradford Dyeing Assoc. v. J. Stog Tech GmbHSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.