Legal Opinion

Chicarella v. Passant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1985No. 202 and 809PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting appellee’s preliminary objections and motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In September, 1982, appellant filed a complaint alleging that an insured under a policy issued by defendant, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, 2 had struck appellant with his automobile. The insured denied that the accident had occurred. Therefore, because appellant’s credibility appeared to be at issue, the insurance company hired Business Information Company (BIC) to investigate appellant’s work history,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Beckman v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. McIlvain v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Elia v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Cooley, William v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency Gerhold, Wayne D. Smith, Karl C. And Donadee, Michael ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API