Legal Opinion

The White Company v. W. P. Farley Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 18, 1927PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Turner,

Commissioner— Affirming.

Appellant is a manufacturer at Cleveland, Ohio, of auto trucks, while appellee is a business man of Mays-ville, By.

On the 1st of October, 1924, the parties entered into a contract of sales agency for the period of one year, whereby appellee became the sales agent of appellant in a designated territory, embracing Mason county.

The contract refers to the manufacturer as “seller” and to the appellee as “purchaser,” and provides, that the seller shall furnish to the purchaser for sale in the designated territory certain kinds and descriptions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schiffman v. Peerless Motor Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Alexander Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Prince v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API