The White Company v. W. P. Farley Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Turner,
Commissioner— Affirming.
Appellant is a manufacturer at Cleveland, Ohio, of auto trucks, while appellee is a business man of Mays-ville, By.
On the 1st of October, 1924, the parties entered into a contract of sales agency for the period of one year, whereby appellee became the sales agent of appellant in a designated territory, embracing Mason county.
The contract refers to the manufacturer as “seller” and to the appellee as “purchaser,” and provides, that the seller shall furnish to the purchaser for sale in the designated territory certain kinds and descriptions…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schiffman v. Peerless Motor Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- Audi Vision Inc. v. RCA Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Ford Motor Co. v. Alexander Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Prince v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.