Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vanderbeek v. Vernon Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 17, 2002No. 00SC960Published

1DissentJustice Bender

The majority engages in a cogent and well-reasoned discussion of the law of consequential damages for economic torts. However, because I believe that it is not necessary to consider this area of the law and because I disagree with the majority's conclusion that lost profits cannot be recovered in this case as a matter of law, I respectfully dissent.

In my view, the question in this case is not what damages are available when an economic tort occurs. Instead, the question we must address is what damages are authorized by Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 102(n)(2).

The authority of a court to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. LazereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. J.P. Meyer Trucking & Construction, Inc. v. Colorado School Districts Self Insurance PoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Gurley v. TomkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Watson v. FenneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API