Legal Opinion
Haung v. Acterna Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 18, 2004No. Civ.A. No. DKC 2003-1131PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this securities fraud class action is the motion of Joseph De Leo and Stan Andrews for (1) appointment as Lead Plaintiffs and (2) approval of Lead Plaintiffs’ selection of Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the court will deny the motion and require renewed notice.
I. Background
On April 16, 2003, a securities fraud class action was filed against Acterna Corporation (Acterna) and five of its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Oxford Health Plans Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- In re Lucent Technologies, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Yousefi v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
- A.F.I.K. Holding SPRL v. FassDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fagen v. Enviva Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- In re Under Armour Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Walker v. Chidambaran.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025