Legal Opinion

In re Under Armour Securities Litigation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 29, 2022No. 1:17-cv-00388Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * IN RE UNDER ARMOUR SECURITIES LITIGATION * Civil Action No. RDB-17-0388 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION The basic allegation in this putative class action is that Defendants Under Armour, Inc. (“Under Armour”) and its former Chief Executive Officer Kevin Plank (“Plank”) (collectively, “Defendants”) misrepresented the level of consumer demand for Under Armour products. The Consolidated Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (ECF No. 153) alleges violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities and Exchange…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API