Legal Opinion
QUEIROZ v. Harvey
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 2009No. CV-08-0308-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 In this opinion, we address whether a court may consider a real estate agent’s inequitable conduct in deciding if the agent’s principal is entitled to specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. We conclude that the agent’s inequitable acts may be imputed to the principal whether or not the principal knew of the agent’s misconduct.
I 1
¶ 2 Daniel Harvey listed ten acres of land in Tonopah for sale. Through his agent, Charles Harrison, Ivo Queiroz offered to purchase the land, along with an additional ten acres. The purchase offer called for a $1,000…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- City of Phoenix v. FieldsArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Dawson v. McNaneyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Weiner v. RomleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow MemorialArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Beohm v. Pickel (In re Pickel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Jm Homes v. EmpireCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.