Legal Opinion

Klosk v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 26, 1937Published

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

This is an action on two accident and health policies for benefits by reason of the alleged total and continuous disability of plaintiff. Each policy provides for payment of benefits for disability caused by disease. The pertinent clause of each policy provides, in effect, that if the disease prevents the plaintiff from performing any and every duty pertaining to his occupation he should be entitled to the benefits prescribed by the policy.

The plaintiff is an officer of several corporations owning real estate and personally manages their affairs, and in that capacity visits the various…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garms v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Neill v. Order of United FriendsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Goldstein v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Collis v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API