Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Ford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1927No. 20128. En BancPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This case originated in a justice court for King county where a criminal complaint was filed charging the defendant (respondent here) with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Seattle. The defendant was there convicted, and appealed to the superior court for King county, where the case was tried on an agreed statement of facts. The superior court held the ordinance invalid as to the particular offense here charged, and by its judgment discharged the defendant. From that judgment, the city has appealed.

The agreed statement of facts sets out the parts of the ordinance involved and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Makris v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. WASH. STATE FARM BUREAU FEDER. v. GregoireWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API