Legal Opinion

Himrod v. McFayden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1925No. Appeal, 51PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is an appeal from a decree directing specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. No exceptions were filed to the findings of fact, the conclusions of law or the decree nisi. Where no exceptions have been taken to findings of fact, they are admitted; an. appeal questions merely their sufficiency to support the final decree: Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co., 280 Pa. 449, 452; Schwartz v. Wesoky, 281 Pa. 388, 392; Fidelity T. & T. Co. v. Hays, 281 Pa. 461, 463. Though exceptions to the findings and decree nisi were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Schwartz v. WesokySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  5. Fidelity T. & T. Co. v. HaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Pittsburgh Cut Wire Co. v. SufrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Ruth v. CraneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API