Legal Opinion
Fee v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
By the provision relied upon, the defendant insurance company agreed—
“To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of:
“A. bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death resulting therefrom, hereinafter called ‘bodily injury,’ sustained by any person;
“B. injury to or destruction of property, including loss of use thereof, hereinafter called ‘property damage;’ “arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of the owned automobile or any nonowned automobile, and the company shall defend any suit alleging such bodily…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Zachman v. ZachmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shorewood School Dist. v. Wausau Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Harris v. Metropolitan MallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- School District of Shorewood v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Thomas v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.