Legal Opinion
Almonte v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of New York, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 15, 1996No. 3:95CV1458 (PCD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Defendants The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc., Robert Marguis and Leonard Marley (“Defendants”) filed a Motion for Rule 16(f) Sanctions for Failure to Obey Scheduling Order (“Motion to Strike”) and a Rule 16(f) Motion to Dismiss for Repeated Contumacy (“Motion to Dismiss”) against Plaintiff Victor M. Almonte (“Plaintiff’). In both motions Defendants requested their expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred as a result of Plaintiffs failure to comply with discovery in this case. For the following reasons, Defendants'…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lucas v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Simmons v. AbruzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Walter L. Jones and Walter L. Jones Development Corporation, Inc. v. Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (Nfta)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peters-Turnbull v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Russo v. Estée Lauder Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Loubier v. Modern Acoustics, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Wang v. Omni Hotels Management CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023