Legal Opinion

Loubier v. Modern Acoustics, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 10, 1999No. 3:97-CV-1200(GLG)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), defendants move to dismiss this action with prejudice. In connection with this motion to dismiss, plaintiffs have moved to compel production of documents and to modify the case management plan. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is DENIED and plaintiffs’ motions are GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, who are the trustees of various state-wide employee benefit plans (the “Funds”), brought this action against Modern Acoustics and its alleged successors, alter egos, and principal. Plaintiffs claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Lucas v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Simmons v. AbruzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Spencer v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API