Legal Opinion
Runyon v. Fasi
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 15, 1991No. Civ. 90-00752 DAEPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Laurence Runyon (“Runyon”) brings this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Runyon’s motion came on for hearing before this court on April 15, 1991. Carl M. Varady, Esq. appeared on behalf of Runyon; Sandra A. Simms, Esq. appeared on behalf of the defendants. The court, having heard oral argument and having considered the memoranda submitted in support of and in opposition to Runyon’s motion, finds that ordinance 86-96 which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Collier v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Cleveland Area Board of Realtors v. The City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- HRPT PROPERTIES TRUST v. LingleDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
- Kaneshiro v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.