Legal Opinion
Bockover v. Perko
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1994No. A061812PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
Margaret Bockover appeals from a judgment the trial court entered after sustaining the demurrer of respondents Robert Perko, Frank Robles, Richard Van Slyke, Joseph E. Krueger, and the Regents of the University of California, individually and doing business as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Laboratory). She contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The Laboratory hired Bockover in December 1986 as a protective service officer, and she began work on December 22…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees of Saint Agnes Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Townsel v. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Brown v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.