Legal Opinion
Peterson v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 16, 1964No. 5629; 5630PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The facts in these companion cases have already been reported in detail in prior opinions of this court. In Peterson v. Norwalk, 150 Conn. 366, 190 A.2d 33, an action for a declaratory judgment, we held that a contract between the defendant city, the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company and the United Aircraft Corporation for the construction and maintenance of a bridge over the tracks of the railroad was valid except for the maintenance provision and the provision which required the city to pay more than one-half of the cost of relocating the railroad transmission lines. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Peterson v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Rude v. BuchhalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- West Haven Bank & Trust Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- South Norwalk Trust Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cooley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sendroff v. Food Mart of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.