Glassey v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
These two cases were tried and have been argued together. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence in the Superior Court the presiding judge ruled at the defendant’s request that the plaintiffs could not recover and directed verdicts for the defendant. The cases are here on exceptions by the plaintiffs to these rulings.
The case of the plaintiff Rachel, who is a married woman, is for injuries alleged to have been received by her in consequence of the negligence of the defendant in leaving a large reel by the side of or in Cameron Street in Clinton, which some boys rolled down the street and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hanlon v. South Boston Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
3Cited by36 opinions
- Field v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Lowrie v. CastleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Horan v. Inhabitants of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- McKenna v. AndreassiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Milbury v. Turner Centre SystemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.