Legal Opinion

Davis v. State Budget & Control Board

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 1989No. 1304PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is a declaratory judgment action to determine whether the State Insurance Reserve Fund must offer underinsured motorist coverage to those state agencies and political subdivisions to which it provides motor vehicle liability coverage. Relying on State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Wannamaker, 291 S. C. 518, 354 S. E. (2d) 555 (1987), the circuit court ruled that the Fund must offer underinsured motorist insurance to its insureds. We reverse.

Earl J. Davis is a police officer of the Town of Goose Creek, South Carolina. He was struck by an oncoming car when he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Wright v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Miller v. AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Davis v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API