Legal Opinion

Capra v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1979No. 78-38PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Following a directed verdict in their favor the Smiths were awarded damages from Capra for breach of implied warranty of habitability. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed, holding it was a jury question whether or not Capra was a "builder-vendor" and therefore subject to the rule of Cochran v. Keeton,287 Ala. 439, 252 So.2d 313 (1971). We granted certiorari. We reverse the Court of Civil Appeals and remand for further proceedings.

The facts of this case are set out in some detail in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. Capra v. Smith, [MS August 23, 1978] 372 So.2d 317 (Ala.Civ.App.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. KeetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Klos v. GockelWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cochran v. KeetonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Capra v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sims v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Tassan v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Schepps v. HoweWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Sloat v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API