Legal Opinion

Sloat v. Matheny

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 30, 1981No. 80SC74PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Chief Justice.

It is a well established rule in Colorado that a builder-vendor of a new home is liable to the buyer for breach of implied warranties of workmanlike construction and habitability. In Sloat v. Matheny, Colo.App., 605 P.2d 71 (1980) the court of appeals carved out an exception to this rule by holding that under the special circumstances of this case the builder-vendor was not liable to the buyer. We granted certiorari and now reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Defendant-respondent, C. E. Matheny commenced construction on a new home for his family. 1 He had…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. WellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. G-W-L, Inc. v. RobichauxTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Park v. SohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API