People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
The Potomac Electric Power Company (hereinafter “Pepeo” or “the Company”) and the People’s Counsel appeal pursuant to D.C.Dode 1973, § 43-705, from an order of the Public Service Commission (hereinafter “PSC” or “the Commission”) which granted a rate increase to Pepeo for retail service in the District of Columbia in Formal Case No. 685. We reject petitioners’ claims and affirm the order of the Public Service Commission on all challenged grounds with the exception of the decision to exclude unam-ortized credit from termination of the Douglas Point plant project from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Washington Public Interest Organization v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- People's Counsel of the District of Columbia v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Pub. Serv. Com'n of Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Office of the People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.