Legal Opinion
United States v. Pub. Serv. Com'n of Dist. of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 1983No. 82-988PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
On November 12,1981, the Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company (hereinafter C & P) filed an application with the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (hereinafter PSC or Commission), designated Formal Case No. 777, requesting permanent authority to increase its schedule of rates and tariffs for telephone service in the District of Columbia by $132.1 million dollars. The People’s Counsel was authorized to represent the consumers of the District of Columbia; as a matter of right, however, intervention was granted to the United States General Services…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Watergate East, Inc. v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- People's Counsel of the District of Columbia v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- District of Columbia v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.