Mary Elizabeth Flickinger v. Toys R Us - DE Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The Flickingers appeal the judgment in favor of Toys “R” Us, entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on September 28, 2011, after a jury returned a verdict finding no negligence and no liability on the part of Toys “R” Us. The Flickingers now challenge six decisions made by the District Court during the trial. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
I
Because we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with the facts and the proceedings in the District Court, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Patricia KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Basell USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Carden, Raymond C. v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nussbaum v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Clayton County v. SegrestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- BEAM v. WOLFDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Clayton County v. SegrestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- RAUSO v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.