Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Park Hill Golf Club

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1953No. 16,912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The parties are here in the same order as they appeared in the trial court. In the interest of clarity, as well as brevity, we will herein designate plaintiff in error as trustee, and defendant in error as golf club or defendant.

This action was commenced by the filing of a complaint in the original proceedings, In the Matter of the Estate of George W. Clayton, deceased, being No. 5702 *594of the county court in and for the City and County of Denver. Its object is to have declared null and void the lease pursuant to which the golf club claims the right to possession of certain premises the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clayton v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. Hutcheson v. HodnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Galiger v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piz v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. RAYMOND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. BisbanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. In Re Clayton's EstateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API